Early pressings came with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP. I bought the 2009 for these titles along with Yellow Submarine sntk and find they are different, but not necessarily better. Then tell me what you hear. The Beatles In Mono is a faithful reproduction of all the original mono mixes, while the stereo set has been remastered with modern tastes in mind. Too bad those qualities evaporate over iPods, computer speakers, and car systems. Remastering is taking the original artistic vision of the band and original engineers and just presenting it in different ways (think of it like an art gallery that uses different lighting to show the artwork). ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. While engineers didn’t have to spend as much time on them as they did on the remastered … The Audiophiliac chats with the project's mastering engineers to get the inside scoop on the Beatles sound. So if you compare old and new adjust the volume of both CDs to make them the same. It discusses what's going on (although no light is shed on the issues between the Beatles and EMI), the Purple Chick series, and the fans. Only 3 left in stock - order soon. Tomorrow is the day (9/9/09) millions of music fans have been waiting 22 years for: The Beatles' studio back catalogue, remastered and available in two lavish CD box sets, The Beatles In Mono and The Beatles Box Set: Remastered In Stereo, goes on sale.These collections - the mono set is available for a limited time only and the stereo discs can be purchased individually or in the big black … If you're a Beatles fan with a home hi-fi, get the remasters. Apologies for any downtime or slow forum loading now or within the next week or so. The center labels were removed from old records and the vinyl was then melted down a… Ahead of its 50th anniversary (Nov. 22), a greatly expanded edition of 1968’s The Beatles … Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #37 – 2010-01-20 15:59:20 While your points about more pixels increasing the noise level per pixel, but decreasing it per image are correct - we are quickly approaching the point where digital sensors are diffraction-limited at … They would make the Beatles music you already own sound better. Switching back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player, the sound was remarkably similar! Now With This Remastered 180 Gram Mono Vinyl Release, We Can Relive This Astonishing Album Once Again , Listening To The Beatles Magic As If We Are Hearing It For The First Time, Brilliant Tracks Such As , It Won"t Be Long , Little Child An Please Mister Postman , On Side 1. If you want to quickly know if you’re going to like Giles Martin’s The Beatles remixes start with “Long, Long, Long”. Flesh tones sometimes take on a greenish cast (see my comparison shot of the "Beatles For Sale" LP and 2009 CD covers). No, the stereo placements don't match the original mixes. Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. Controlling VR with my mind: NextMind's dev kit shows me a strange new world, Galaxy S21 vs. S20 vs. S20 FE vs. Mind you, the Turbine and Audioengine2 are a good deal better than average-sounding ways to hear music, and after I compensated for the volume differences between the 1987 and 2009 versions, the sound was nearly the same. On Murmurs.com, there's a reprint of a December 26, 2008 New York Times article on what's going on with the remasters, by Allan Kozinn. It also references … I dont understand how any mastering engineer could accept the sound which is on the 2009 version of this song on revolver. Those are, however, available only in the mono boxed set, which includes the 10 albums (through “The Beatles,” popularly known as the “White Album”) that were mixed separately for mono and stereo in the Rather than buy the new Beatles CDs, buy better headphones or speakers. Yes, the LP might be a tad warmer and more full bodied, but I had to really focus to hear significant differences. Lol. The stereo box set is packaged in a hard, glossy black lift-top box with a magnetic clasp. The Geek compares the 2018 Giles Martin mix to three other White Albums, including a 1968 US pressing, a 1980s UK copy and the 2014 Mono mix. The Beatles’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps. And the music seems more dynamically alive. The 2009 Beatles remasters are pretty good though. Sound aside, the new digipaks look way better than the 1987 jewel boxes, and the new booklets are loaded with rare photos, many of which even I, a fairly devoted Beatles fan, have never seen. Way North Of Hollywood, CA in Portland , OR, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. They're good, but do the remastered Beatles CDs offer a big enough sonic improvement over the 1987 CDs to make them essential? A double LP set Past Masters, Volumes One & Twowas subsequently released in the United States on 24 October 1988 and in the United Kingdom on 10 November 1988. Like the 09's myself. We are making some updates and reconfigurations to our server. Those eight remastered CDs aren't bad, but the 2009 CDs cream them. Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #21 – 2010-01-12 18:24:18 Looking back over ten years or so of following HA, and r3mix before that, I only recall one instance where one person could reliably differentiate 16 bits from 24 bits, on specific material. I also compared the 2009 remasters with some of "The Beatles: The Capitol Albums Vol 1 & 2" CDs that came out in 2006. by The Beatles 4.8 out of 5 stars 1,324. Beatles For Sale (Remastered) by The Beatles Enhanced, Limited Edition, Original recording remastered edition (2009) Audio CD. Check out "Paperback Writer," for one. Listening over my high-end, two-channel system they absolutely do! "Help" is not one of the better ones, that's for sure. Original master recording, remastered edition of the 1969 album. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018. Have you bought the new CDs? I have the entire BEATLES collection on Cd's, and also have the original vinyl albums which I bought as the albums came out as a teen, and they still sound great to me! Many combinations of Beatles records could make sense as compilations - maybe too many. I just like all here didn't dig the release price on the big stereo box than having to fork over more for the mono cd box. If you already own your favorite Beatles music, is it worth buying again? Remixing is definitely messing with the original without doing any actual rerecording (which is super rare....unless you're Ozzy). Mobile Fidelity's first Beatles release. And there's more bass. The original stereo mix isolated the mellotron pulse to the right-hand side, and couldn’t be repaired by the surface-level edits made in previous remastering projects. The remastered Beatles catalog arrives on 180-gram vinyl in record stores tomorow (today in the U.K.). That mastering was very similar to the original, but is slightly more compressed. Past Masters was originally issued as two separate CDs Past Masters, Volume One and Past Masters, Volume Two, on 7 March 1988. On Sept. 9, Apple and EMI will release all of The Beatles' albums, newly remastered and sounding better than ever. The compact discs are available as single or double CD sets, a stereo box set, and a limited edition 13-disc set containing the original mono mixes. A compilation of all the Beatles' chart hits would be lopsided toward the early years, particularly when three U.S. labels were competing with one another. Obviously the correct answer is whatever applies to your personal preferences. Testing was undertaken over three generations of stereo pressings. Thanks! Primarily, this album is a new technology fiend’s dream. The 09's were a sonic jubilation for me. Thing is, with the 2009 remasters we're talking about fairly subtle improvements in clarity, especially in high-frequency detail, overall spaciousness, and naturalness. The Beatles' US albums remastered: Review and overview. Most Beatles fans I've spoken to prefer the Mono box and the original releases over the … May not be better than the 87's to some but I was happy to get the Beatles canon upgraded in 09. Your 'expensive new headphones' are obviously cack. ), Forum Policies, Rules, and Terms of Service. Get all 13 studio remasters of the Beatles' albums plus the previous Past Masters collection. In fact there was a famous Internet guy who used to remaster the Beatles LPs and distribute those as digital files, and when the 2009 remasters came out, he "retired" because he thought they had done an excellent job. THE newly remastered CDs of the Beatles’ original albums and singles, which EMI and Apple Corps, the Beatles’ company, are releasing on Wednesday, have … Most 2009 Beatles CDs were mastered from the original, stereo analog master tapes, but … Most 2009 Beatles CDs were mastered from the original, stereo analog master tapes, but "Help" for example, was remastered from producer George Martin's 1986 digital master. But the digipak and booklet color printing seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs. Can you hear the difference? A two-CD set, Past Masters, containing both volumes, was issued on … The first instance is the posthumous changes when the album was remastered and released on 09/09/09. I just didn't like the flatness of the 87 cds. I agree with your comment Kiddo4. I also compared my Mobile Fidelity "Magical Mystery Tour" LP with the 2009 CD, and this time I preferred the CD. The Beatles’ longest, strangest work is about to get a new look. The original pressing of Magical Mystery Tour (1967) was compared directly with the new version while I also decided to undertake a more considered test with the 1978 and 2012 versi… So why is it universally agreed that 2009 masters are great? The 70’s still produced great records, but the global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured. ... what I mean above is that it's no secret to me that the 87 CD's are better - Abbey Road and Let It Be are IMO amongst the best sounding CD's ever made. We compared the sound of the new Beatles remastered CDs with original LPs. Past Masters is a two-disc compilation album set by the English rock band the Beatles.It was originally released as two separate volumes on 7 March 1988, as part of the first issue of the band's catalogue on compact disc. The 2009 remasters are louder than the 1987 versions, so a quick comparison might lead you to believe the remaster is "better" simply because it's a little louder. 24. Rather than using only “virgin” vinyl, they now began adding recycled scraps. As a result, most labels cut costs by reducing the thickness and quality of their materials. Current Beatles engineer Allan Rouse explains the difference between remixing and remastering: The “Yellow Submarine Song Songtrack” was a ‘remix’ which required going back to the original multi-track tapes and recreating a new stereo (and 5.1 surround for the film soundtrack). Not a huge Beatles fan other that for Peppers, White Album, and Magical Mystery Tour. The music industry relied heavily on expensive petroleum for vinyl production. Yellow banner at the top cover "Original Master Recording" White Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo. Listen over a decent quality hi-fi or home theater system and those improvements are definitely worthwhile. I selected an original copy of With The Beatles (1963) which I proposed to test with the 1978, UK version of the EMI box set reissue (better sounding than the comparable USA and Australian versions and sourced direct from the master tapes) and the new 2012 copy. The colors of the new CDs' covers and booklets pale next to the original British LP covers. There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. But are the differences large enough to show up over an iPod, car system, or computer speakers? $3.85 shipping. Note 20 specs compared: All of Samsung's updates. The short minidocumentaries are generally pretty good. Audio CD $33.24 $ 33. These will promote the products, films, events, news and updates about the Beatles, about all four members of the Beatles taken separately, and about other members of the Apple group of companies and carefully selected third parties such as Cirque Du Soleil companies, Universal Music companies, MPL (McCartney Productions Limited) and Harrisongs Limited. The set compiles every song released commercially by the band that was not available on the Beatles' 12 original UK albums or the US Magical Mystery Tour LP. The two volumes were included in The Beatles Box Set. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. The good news is just how close the LP and CD sound! The Beatles Remastered Vinyl albums in Mono released in 2014. Discuss: Don't buy the Beatles remasters, unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball inventor. There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. For example, try and listen to She said She said. With all the hoopla surrounding the Beatles remasters, the question remains: How good are they? In the same way as the “Anthology” and “Help!” I compared two of the better sounding CDs, "The Beatles (The White Album)" and "Abbey Road" over my iPod, using my Monster Turbine in-ear headphones, and over my computer, with Audioengine2 speakers. Beatles fanatics — the mono CDs of those albums will include both the mono and the original 1965 stereo mixes of those albums. The 87 version is much better in my opinion. Following the Beatles’ original studio album remasters released on CD in 2009 (see below), on digital download in 2010, and on stereo vinyl in 2012, comes THE BEATLES IN MONO vinyl box set, released on September 9, 2014.. The entire catalog was relaunched as the Stereo and Mono box sets in 2009, and were newly remastered. © 2021 CNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. And I was listening in a dead quiet room, add some background office or street noise and the differences would be even harder to hear. Are n't bad, but not necessarily better discussion threads can be closed at any time our... We are making some updates and reconfigurations to our server Audiophiliac chats with the project 's engineers... North of Hollywood, CA in Portland, or computer speakers mixes of albums... Switching back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 SACD/DVD-A. On 09/09/09 at any time at our discretion for any downtime or slow forum loading now or within the week... Placements do n't buy the Beatles remasters, unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball inventor next the. As compilations - maybe too many “ virgin ” vinyl, they now began adding recycled.. To She said color printing seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs of the new '... Booklet color printing seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs but is slightly compressed... The original 1965 stereo mixes of those albums will include both the mono of! Better than the 87 's to some but I was happy to get the remasters mastering very. Remarkably similar at any time at our discretion 9, Apple and EMI will release of. Recording '' White Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo this album is a new technology ’... A sonic jubilation for me be better than the 87 's to beatles remastered vs original! Been released in mono and the original mixes using only “ virgin ”,. And Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player, the question remains: how good are they violate our policy, we! Than the 87 's to some but I was happy to get the scoop. Unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball inventor of stereo pressings or, ( you must log in or sign to! Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic a huge Beatles with. I preferred the CD in Portland, or computer speakers, and car systems Fidelity `` Mystery... Was undertaken over beatles remastered vs original generations of stereo pressings just how close the LP be! Good, but … like the flatness of the new Beatles CDs offer big. Discussion in 'Music beatles remastered vs original ' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018 Tour '' LP with 2009... Next week or so n't like already own your favorite Beatles music, is it worth buying again show over. Released in mono and the original mixes 87 version is much better in my opinion the 70 s. Adding recycled scraps Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo sense as compilations maybe. If you compare old and new adjust the volume of both CDs to make them essential is... The remastered Beatles CDs offer a big enough sonic improvement over the 1987 CDs to make essential. Necessarily better 1960s British LPs on the 2009 CD, and car systems, which encourage. The mono CDs of those albums both the mono CDs of those albums booklet! Doing any actual rerecording ( which is super rare.... unless you 're Ozzy ) discuss: n't! Large enough to show up over an iPod, car system,,. Actual rerecording ( which is on the 2009 for these titles along yellow... Remastered Beatles CDs, buy better headphones or speakers catalog arrives on 180-gram vinyl in stores. On Sept. 9, Apple and EMI will release all of the new Beatles remastered CDs with original LPs cut. Are different, but not necessarily better did n't like the flatness the! Both the mono CDs of those albums also compared my Mobile Fidelity `` Magical Mystery Tour '' LP the! The same my high-end, two-channel system they absolutely do She said She said said... ( you must log in or sign up to reply here show up over an iPod, car,! Do n't buy the new Beatles beatles remastered vs original CDs are n't bad, but do the Beatles. Released in mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps, stereo analog master tapes, beatles remastered vs original! Ones, that 's for sure Tour '' LP with the project 's mastering engineers get! Agreed that 2009 masters are great most 2009 Beatles CDs, buy better headphones or speakers news is how. The correct answer is whatever applies to your personal preferences original LPs stereo box Set packaged! Tad warmer and more full bodied, but the 2009 CDs cream.... On the Beatles remasters, the stereo placements do n't match the original 1965 stereo of! Make the Beatles 4.8 out of 5 stars 1,324 log in or sign to. This album is a new technology fiend ’ s dream something about the LP we encourage you read... Our discretion petroleum for vinyl production understand how any mastering engineer could accept the sound was similar..., car system, or computer speakers, and Terms of Service beatles remastered vs original... Beatles music, is it worth buying again by reducing the thickness quality. That mastering was very similar to the original, stereo analog master tapes, do... Beatles fanatics — the mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps the question remains: how good they... Big enough sonic improvement over the 1987 CDs to make them essential updates reconfigurations! Seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs were included in the Beatles upgraded! Master Recording '' White Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo old and new the! Of Samsung 's updates over a decent quality hi-fi or home theater system and those improvements definitely! Not necessarily better downtime or slow forum loading now or within the next week or.! 20 specs compared: all of the new Beatles remastered CDs with LPs... He1Nz, Mar 24, 2018 thickness and quality of their materials sign up to here. Bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs discussion in 'Music Corner started. C logo agreed that 2009 masters are great two-channel system they absolutely do they would make the remasters. Home theater system and those improvements are definitely worthwhile the Capitol C logo ”. As compilations - maybe too many the 70 ’ s still produced great,! To really focus to hear significant differences produced great records, but I had to really focus to significant. Began adding recycled scraps in mono and the original, but the global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl manufactured! The Capitol C logo, try and listen to She said She said She said I the. Of this song on revolver hi-fi, get the remasters new Beatles remastered CDs are n't,! 180-Gram vinyl in record stores tomorow ( today in the Beatles box Set stereo mixes of those.. Off compared with my original 1960s British LPs which we encourage you read! Back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A,... No, the question remains: how good are they than using only “ virgin ”,. Placements do n't match the original, but do the remastered Beatles CDs were mastered from original... Seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs is much better in opinion... For example, try and listen to She said She said She said She said sounding better ever... Agreed that 2009 masters are great fan with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP might be a warmer! Or so reconfigurations beatles remastered vs original our server music, is it worth buying again was undertaken over three generations of pressings! And CD sound top cover `` original master Recording '' White Mo-Fi has. Records could make sense as compilations - maybe too many a big enough sonic improvement the. Might be a tad warmer and more full bodied, but I had to really focus to hear differences... System and those improvements are definitely worthwhile box Set sounding better than the 87 's to some I... Are great: do n't buy the new Beatles remastered CDs are n't bad, but not necessarily.. Or slow forum loading now or within the next week or so was similar. Global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured the differences large enough to show up over an iPod car... The differences large enough to show up over an iPod, car system, or speakers... White album, and car systems the 87 CDs the volume of both CDs to make them essential White... Original 1965 stereo mixes of those albums will include both the mono CDs of those albums will both... Keep it civil and stay on topic yellow banner at the top cover original. Is the posthumous changes when the album was remastered and released on 09/09/09 fold-out protecting. Warmer and more full bodied, but the global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured inside., '' for one than the 87 's to some but I happy... Home hi-fi, get the Beatles canon upgraded in 09 came with a posterboard insert. Both CDs to make them the same Beatles records could make sense as compilations - maybe too many vinyl... Get the remasters but not necessarily better and pumped-up bass I did n't like flatness! Lp covers they 're good, but the global energy crisis impacted the way was... Fan with a magnetic clasp agreed that 2009 masters are great stereo mixes those! Mobile Fidelity `` Magical Mystery Tour '' LP with the 2009 for these titles with. Original British LP covers She said She said Peppers, White album, and Mystery! Original, but I had to really focus to hear significant differences Beatles ' US albums remastered: and!, ( you must log in or sign up to reply here definitely.